LeadMagic
LeadMagic waterfalls across multiple B2B data providers in real time and returns enriched contact and account data. It is newer than Clay but competes directly on enrichment coverage and undercuts on price. The UI is simpler and the feature set is narrower.
Official site ↗Why it ranks here
Strong alternative to Clay for teams that prioritize cost over power. The waterfall works, the data is good, and the credit economics are better. It does not match Clay on AI research or workflow complexity.
Where it sits
LeadMagic undercuts Clay on price and simplicity but cannot match its workflow depth or AI research. For straightforward enrichment (give me contacts), LeadMagic works. For custom logic or AI agents, Clay remains necessary.
How GTM Engineering teams use it
Teams upload a list of domains or LinkedIn URLs, LeadMagic waterfalls across providers, and they export enriched records to their CRM. Some integrate via API to enrich records in real time as they enter Salesforce.
In-depth notes
The credit model is transparent and cheaper than Clay for most use cases. Provider coverage is good but not as deep as Clay. The roadmap is active; expect the feature gap to close. Best for teams that do not need the full Clay orchestration engine.
Best for
Cost-effective waterfall enrichment without AI research
Avoid if
You need AI agents or complex multi-step workflows
The rest of Orchestration & enrichment
Learning guide
Setup
Sign up, add credits, and upload a CSV with domains or LinkedIn URLs. The waterfall runs automatically across all providers.
First thing to build
Upload 100 target accounts with domains, export enriched contacts with emails and titles, and load them into your CRM.
What actually matters
- Set filters to request only specific job titles or seniorities
- Enable email verification to reduce bounce rates
- Configure CSV column mapping if your input format differs from defaults
Watch out
Teams forget to verify emails before sending outbound and hit bounce issues despite enrichment coverage.